A Principled Framework for Modular Web Rule Bases and Its Semantics
نویسندگان
چکیده
We present a principled framework for modular web rule bases, called MWeb. According to this framework, each predicate defined in a rule base is characterized by its defining reasoning mode, scope, and exporting rule base list. Each predicate used in a rule base is characterized by its requesting reasoning mode and importing rule base list. For valid MWeb modular rule bases S , the MWebAS and MWebWFS semantics of each rule base s ∈ S w.r.t. S are defined, model-theoretically. These semantics extend the answer set semantics (AS) and the well-founded semantics with explicit negation (WFSX) on ELPs, respectively, keeping all of their semantical and computational characteristics. Our framework supports: (i) local semantics and different points of view, (ii) local closed-world and open-world assumptions, (iii) scoped negation-as-failure, (iv) restricted propagation of local inconsistencies, and (v) monotonicity of reasoning, for “fully shared” predicates.
منابع مشابه
Semantic Web Technologies: From Theory to Practice Kumulative HABILITATIONSSCHRIFT zur Erlangung der Lehrbefugnis im Fach INFORMATIONSSYSTEME
In the ongoing discussion about combining rules and Ontologies on the Semantic Web a recurring issue is how to combine first-order classical logic with nonmonotonic rule languages. Whereas several modular approaches to define a combined semantics for such hybrid knowledge bases focus mainly on decidability issues, we tackle the matter from a more general point of view. In this paper we show how...
متن کاملQuantified Equilibrium Logic and Hybrid Rules
In the ongoing discussion about combining rules and Ontologies on the Semantic Web a recurring issue is how to combine first-order classical logic with nonmonotonic rule languages. Whereas several modular approaches to define a combined semantics for such hybrid knowledge bases focus mainly on decidability issues, we tackle the matter from a more general point of view. In this paper we show how...
متن کاملOpen and Closed World Reasoning in the Semantic Web
In this paper general mechanisms and syntactic restrictions are explored in order to specify and merge rule bases in the Semantic Web. Rule bases are expressed by extended logic programs having two forms of negation, namely strong (or explicit) and weak (also known as default negation or “negation as failure”). The proposed mechanisms are defined by very simple modular program transformations, ...
متن کاملSupporting Open and Closed World Reasoning on the Web
In this paper general mechanisms and syntactic restrictions are explored in order to specify and merge rule bases in the Semantic Web. Rule bases are expressed by extended logic programs having two forms of negation, namely strong (or explicit) and weak (also known as default negation or negation-as-failure). The proposed mechanisms are defined by very simple modular program transformations, an...
متن کاملThe F(rames)-Logic Approach for Description Languages II: A Hybrid Integration of Rules and Descriptions
Descriptions andRules are di erent, complementary, essential forms of knowledge. Descriptions areanalytic and closed; rules are contingent and open. Historically, descriptions and rules were developedalong separate lines, by di erent communities. The two forms can be integrated either by compilingone form within the other, or by constructing a hybrid framework. The hybrid soluti...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008